Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-03-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2018-03-15 House Journal Page 2719 HB 259 The following, which was held from the March 14 calendar (page 2704), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 259(JUD) "An Act relating to containing or confining loads being transported on highways." Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 259(JUD) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Tuck: Page 2, line 3: Delete the second occurrence of "or" Insert "and" 2018-03-15 House Journal Page 2720 Page 2, line 7: Delete "or" Insert "and" Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Eastman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 259(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 34 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Pruitt, Sullivan-Leonard Excused: Chenault, Millett, Talerico And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 3, lines 7 - 8: Delete all material and insert: "(g) In this section, (1) "criminal negligence" has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900; (2) "load" means material intentionally transported by the person to be offloaded at a destination, but does not include extraneous material such as litter, snow, mud, or ice." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 2018-03-15 House Journal Page 2721 Representative Kopp objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 259(JUD) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 33 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Eastman, Neuman, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Chenault, Millett, Talerico And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. CSHB 259(JUD) am was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 259(JUD) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 259(JUD) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Neuman, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Chenault, Millett, Talerico And so, CSHB 259(JUD) am passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.